Today's NOT the last day you can contribute to support this site

It's a new tax year, so you've missed the chance to contribute to your favorite tax-exempt charity for the 2009 tax year. Fortunately, that's no problem with ThisCantBeHappening.net, because TCBH is not tax-exempt (I don't have the money to hire a fancy lawyer).That means if you value this site, if you come regularly to read the articles, you can make 2010 the year you start supporting it. The articles that run here don't appear magically. They have to be researched, reported and written. Your friendly journalist/webmaster has to be paid (and feed his family!). So screw the tax break! Give free media a break! Donate to ThisCantBeHappening! All I'm looking for is a microdonation: $5 or $10 a year from each regular reader. That's just 43 cents or 86 cents a month! If you value this site, send a check to me at POB 846, Ambler, PA 19002 or go to the Paypal button.


ATTENTION! If you are on the blast list for getting notices about new posts on this site, please resend your email address to me at dlindorff@yahoo.com. Because of a corruption of my email software, I can no longer access the mailing list. Sorry for the inconvenience.

It's April 15: Time to Pay for War, Killing and Oppression Once Again

As you’re mailing out that tax return again this year, it’s time to remember once again how much of your hard-earned bucks are being devoted to destruction, imperialist domination, slaughter and war, to funding ridiculous programs like the failed anti-missile system, and also to supporting a massively bureaucratic and overstaffed military.

Even with the current US budget predicted to hit a record $3.5 trillion, thanks to a whopping $800 billion, two-year economic stimulus package, and with several hundred billion being poured into a group of banks and the bottomless pit called AIG, the $800 billion budgeted for the military to date (a figure that includes an $85 billion “supplemental” request for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan) represents 22% of total US spending.

That means that more than one in every five of the dollars you are paying to the IRS will be going to the Pentagon.

For a typical family of four with taxable income of $60,000 and a tax bill of $8201.00, that would mean a “war tax” of $1804.00. For a wealthier two-income family of four with a taxable income of $100,000.00, with a tax bill of $17681.00, that would mean a “war tax” of $3890.00.

Of course, it’s never that simple. Actually, the government’s tax collections this year, because of the deepening recession which has been with us since December 2007, means that tax collections will be way down, not to mention the cuts that were part of the above-mentioned stimulus package. That is to say, tax revenues this year could be below $2.4 trillion, meaning the government will have to borrow at least $1 trillion to pay its bills.

At least a fifth of that debt, or $200 billion, will be for war and general military spending, and it will have to be paid off at interest rates that mean by the time that debt is retired, it will have cost us perhaps triple that amount, or $600 billion.

In fiscal 2008, the government spent $408 billion just on interest on the national debt. At least one quarter of that amount, or $102 billion, was for military-related debt. While this might be a little low, since our military budgets and military debt are rising year after year, what that tells us is that we’re also spending perhaps an extra $40-50 billion a year of our collective tax bill on interest on war debt. That works out to another 15% of your taxes for war.

So make that $60,000-income family’s war tax $2075.00, while the $100,000-income family’s war tax goes to $4474.00.

The reporting on America’s military budget in the mainstream corporate media (some of which is actually owned, like NBC, by conglomerates that are themselves beneficiaries of military spending, and all of which are beneficiaries of considerable ad revenue from military contractors and from the Pentagon itself), has been atrocious, with a lot of talk about “cuts” in pointless hugely expensive weapons systems like the F-22 Raptor, a fighter jet designed to combat an advanced enemy that simply doesn’t exist. The truth is that the proposed 2009 military budget put out by the Obama administration is the largest in history in actual dollars, continuing the trend of the last 11 years in which each year’s military budget has been larger than the prior year’s. It is also the largest military budget, after adjusting for inflation, since WWII.

If that disgusts you, consider what just 25% of that budget, or about $175 billion—the amount that House Finance Committee Chair Barney Frank (D-MA) has proposed cutting—could do, if spent on things this country needs, instead of on killing and preparing to kill. Total federal spending on education for 2009: $46 billion. Total spending on welfare for families with dependent children for 2009: $60 billion. Total federal spending on unemployment compensation for 2009: $43 billion. Total federal transportation spending in 2009: $84 billion. Looked at another way, cutting the military budget by 25% (which is really a modest amount, considering that the US is spending as much on its military machine as the rest of the entire world combined!), would allow the government to increase all those other budgets by 50% and still have $58 billion left over for other useful spending goals like the environment, energy and medical research, etc.

Just a thought for tax day.

It doesn’t have to be this way.

Tim Hardin had it right.


RSS Feed


AddThis Feed Button